Studies In The Book Of Daniel: A Discussion of the Historical Questions by Robert Dick Wilson

	Title Page: Studies In The Book of Daniel
	Introduction
	I. -The Argument From Silence
	II. -Was Daniel An Historical Character?
	III. -Jehoiakim’s Third Year And The Argument From Silence
	IV. -Nebuchadnezzar’s Expedition Against Jerusalem
	V. -The Use Of The Word “King”
	VI. -Belshazzar
	VII. -Darius The Mede
	VIII. -The Medes And The Conquest Of Babylon
	IX. -Darius The Mede And The Kings Of Persia
	Excursus On Words For Land And People
	X. -Darius The Mede Not A Confusion With Darius Hystaspis
	XI. -Darius The Mede Not A Reflection Of Darius Hystaspis
	XII -Darius The Mede Not A Reflection (Continued)
	XIII. -Other Alleged Confusions Of Kings
	XIV. -Susa
	XV. -Nebuchadnezzar’s Madness
	XVI. -Were The Edicts Of The Kings Possible?
	XVII. -The Chaldeans
	Excursus On The Chaldeans
	XVIII. -Daniel And The Wise Men
	Bibliography
	Index (not available)

About this text…

Display Problems